In the case of hermetically closed containers:
Problems caused by poor gas exchange. CO2, O2 and especially
ethylene-concentrations can be far from optimal. Hyperhydricity is also
a result of poor gas exchange.
In the case of loose covers:
Secondary infections, transported by air or by mites and trips.
Empty Microbox with filter
Microboxes with healthy
plants
Materials and methods
Containers: all incubations were performed in
standard polypropylene boxes, provided with different types of
closures.
Type 1: loose cover without filter, which is
snapped on, but not sealed
Type 2: plain cover being hermetically sealed to
the box
Type 3: Microbox-cover, which is equipped with a
series of depth filters, and which is hermetically closing the box
(figures below).
Investigated species: Anthurium andreanum cultivar
Mylene, which is known to be sensitive for ethylene gas. We prepared
shoot cultures with heavy cutting, in order to produce as much ethylene
as possible.
Medium: a modified medium according to Murashige and
Skoog (1962), solidified with agar.
Environmental conditions:
Incubation temperature: 25°C
Light intensity: approx. 60 µmol.m-2.s-1. a day
and night rhythm of 12 h dark and 12 h light was applied. Adequate
ventilation prevented the CO2 concentration to rise above 0.2%
Contamination pressure: the boxes were placed in
an environment, which was heavily contaminated with mites and spores of
Aspergillus sp.
Analytical methods:
CO2 concentration was measured with an infra red
gas sensor (Engicom Systems)
O2 concentration was determined with a
paramagnetic sensor (Engicom Systems)
Ethylene was detected by means of gas
chromatography according to Smalle and Van der Straeten (1997).
Experimental
This preliminary experiment was carried out in
order to evaluate the Microbox as an in vitro culture container. All
measurements were taken at the beginning of the light phase.
Carbon dioxide
concentrations day/night cycle
Oxygen concentrations
day/night cycle
Ethylene concentrations
Observations
As could be expected, the carbon dioxide
concentration never rose above 0.6 % in all vented containers, which is
considered beneficial for plant production.
The oxygen concentration was in all containers
almost at the same level, allowing dark reactions.
The ethylene concentration was in all vented systems
lower than the detection limit of 0.0625 ng/ml of gas phase, which is
too low to have a visible effect on the plantlets. In our comparative
series with completely closed containers ethylene concentrations as
high as 1.5 ng/ml were measured. On photographs 1 and 2 the effect of
high ethylene concentrations are clearly visible, such as long
internodia, pale green leaves, adventitious air roots and shoot
formation in the medium.
The Microbox shows an even better gas exchange than
the non sealed cover (about 4 gas exchanges per day).
Photo 1: the Microbox, provided with hermetically sealed cover with
filter batteries
Photo 2: healthy plantlets in Microbox
Photo 3: hermetically sealed container, cover without filter
Photo 4: effect of high ethylene concentration and hyperhydricity
Detail of filter
Conclusions
Gas exchange capacity: with respect to gas exchange
the Microbox was found to be at least as good, if not better than the
classically used containers with non welded cover.
Barrier against pests and diseases: a very important
advantage of the Microbox is the perfect protection against
micro-organisms, mites and trips.